Complete Ghaymah Internship Assessment
هذا الالتزام موجود في:
124
postmortem/postmortem-report.md
Normal file
124
postmortem/postmortem-report.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
||||
# Postmortem Report
|
||||
|
||||
## Incident Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Incident:** Application outage due to repeated OOMKilled events.
|
||||
|
||||
**Duration:** 45 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:**
|
||||
- The application was unavailable for users.
|
||||
- API requests failed during the outage.
|
||||
- User experience was significantly affected.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
| Time | Event |
|
||||
|------|-------|
|
||||
| 10:00 | Application deployed successfully. |
|
||||
| 10:08 | Memory usage started increasing rapidly. |
|
||||
| 10:12 | First OOMKilled event occurred. |
|
||||
| 10:13 | Kubernetes restarted the container. |
|
||||
| 10:15–10:40 | Continuous OOMKilled restart loop. |
|
||||
| 10:42 | Engineering team investigated the issue. |
|
||||
| 10:45 | Memory limit increased and application stabilized. |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Root Cause
|
||||
|
||||
The application exceeded its allocated memory limit.
|
||||
|
||||
The container was repeatedly terminated by Kubernetes with an **OOMKilled** event because memory consumption continued growing beyond the configured limit.
|
||||
|
||||
Possible contributing factors:
|
||||
|
||||
- Memory leak inside the application.
|
||||
- Memory limits configured too low.
|
||||
- No Horizontal Pod Autoscaler.
|
||||
- Lack of memory usage alerts.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
The engineering team:
|
||||
|
||||
- Increased container memory limits.
|
||||
- Restarted the deployment.
|
||||
- Verified application health.
|
||||
- Monitored memory consumption until stable.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Actions
|
||||
|
||||
- Configure appropriate memory requests and limits.
|
||||
- Investigate memory leaks.
|
||||
- Enable memory monitoring.
|
||||
- Configure alerting.
|
||||
|
||||
### Long-Term Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
- Implement Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA).
|
||||
- Perform load testing before production.
|
||||
- Review memory usage after each deployment.
|
||||
- Add automatic scaling policies.
|
||||
- Conduct regular post-deployment monitoring.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto-Scaling Policy
|
||||
|
||||
To prevent similar incidents, the platform should implement:
|
||||
|
||||
- Minimum replicas: **2**
|
||||
- Maximum replicas: **10**
|
||||
- Scale out when:
|
||||
- Memory usage > 70%
|
||||
- CPU usage > 70%
|
||||
- Scale in when:
|
||||
- Memory usage < 40%
|
||||
- CPU usage < 40%
|
||||
- Cooldown period: **5 minutes**
|
||||
- Enable automatic replacement of unhealthy pods.
|
||||
|
||||
This policy ensures enough capacity during traffic spikes while reducing resource waste during normal operation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Early Detection Using Ghaymah Monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
The issue can be detected early by monitoring:
|
||||
|
||||
- Memory usage
|
||||
- CPU usage
|
||||
- Container restart count
|
||||
- OOMKilled events
|
||||
- Pod health status
|
||||
- Response time
|
||||
- Error rate
|
||||
|
||||
Recommended alerts:
|
||||
|
||||
- Memory usage above 80%
|
||||
- More than 3 container restarts within 10 minutes
|
||||
- Pod enters CrashLoopBackOff
|
||||
- Health endpoint becomes unavailable
|
||||
- Response time exceeds acceptable thresholds
|
||||
|
||||
These monitoring practices allow engineers to respond before users experience service interruption.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Lessons Learned
|
||||
|
||||
- Proper resource limits are essential.
|
||||
- Continuous monitoring is critical.
|
||||
- Autoscaling improves application availability.
|
||||
- Early alerting reduces downtime.
|
||||
- Capacity planning should be reviewed before production deployments.
|
||||
المرجع في مشكلة جديدة
حظر مستخدم